RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceНеорганические материалы Inorganic Materials

  • ISSN (Print) 0002-337X
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5588

Effect of Gelling Additives on the Behavior of Bioactive TiO–PO/ZnO Composites in a Model Solution

PII
S3034558825050089-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034558825050089
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 61 / Issue number 9-10
Pages
604-613
Abstract
Bioactive TiO–PO/ZnO composites were obtained, which are modified zinc oxide granules (in the inner part) based on Tokem 250 cationite, coated with a titanate-phosphate gel based on the TiO–PO system, followed by immersion in a solution of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) or hydrolyzed liquid glass (sodium silicate). The heat treatment mode of the material is set: stepwise annealing for 30 minutes (150, 250, 350°C), 6 hours (600°C), 1 hour (800°C). The ability to form a calcium phosphate layer on the surface due to the presence of active Ti surface centers was confirmed by trilometric titration to determine the total concentration of calcium and magnesium ions in SBF solution. After immersion in an SBF solution, micro-X-ray spectral analysis captures calcium, zinc, oxygen, titanium, and phosphorus on the surface of the composites, which corresponds to the physiological composition characteristic of bone tissue. To shape the biomaterial, PVA and liquid glass were introduced as gelling additives. The introduction of gelling additives has a beneficial effect on the biological properties of composites, but the stabilization of the total concentration of Ca and Mg ions in samples with a gelling additive of PVA occurs faster than with liquid glass. The obtained samples can be recommended for further research.
Keywords
золь–гель-метод кальций-фосфатные биоматериалы костная ткань композиты гелеобразующая добавка
Date of publication
24.03.2026
Year of publication
2026
Number of purchasers
0
Views
28

References

  1. 1. Hellwinkel J.E., Working Z.M., Certain L., García A.J., Wenke J.C., Bahney C.S. The intersection of fracture healing and infection: orthopaedics research society workshop // J. Orthop. Res. 2022. V. 40. Р. 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25261
  2. 2. El-Ghannam A. Bone reconstruction: from bioceramics to tissue engineering // Expert Rev. Med Devices. 2005. Р. 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.2.1.87
  3. 3. Kohli N., Ho S., Brown S.J., Sawadkar P., Sharma V., Snow M., García-Gareta E. Bone remodelling in vitro: where are we headed: a review on the current understanding of physiological bone remodelling and inflammation and the strategies for testing biomaterials in vitro // Bone. 2018. V. 110. Р. 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2018.01.015
  4. 4. Xue N., Ding X., Huang R., Jiang R., Huang H., Pan X., Min W., Chen J., Duan J.A., Liu P., Wang Y. Bone tissue engineering in the treatment of bone defects // Pharmaceuticals. 2022. V. 15. № 7. Р. 879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15070879
  5. 5. Gkomoza P., Vardavoulias M., Pantelis D., Sarafoglou C. Comparative study of structure and properties of the thermal spray coatings using conventional and nanostructured hydroxyapatite powder, for applications in medical implants // Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019. V. 357 (16). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.10.044
  6. 6. Bigham A., Foroughi F., Rezvani G.E., Rafienia M., Neisiany R.E., Ramakrishna S. The journey of multifunctional bone scaffolds fabricated from traditional toward modern techniques // Bio-Design and Manufacturing. 2020. V. 3. Р. 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00094-4
  7. 7. Zhuang X.-M., Zhou B. Exosome secreted by human gingival fibroblasts in radiations therapy inhibits osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells by transferring miR-23a // Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020. Р. 110672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110672
  8. 8. Hench L.L. Bioceramics: from concept to clinic // J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1991. V. 7. Р. 1487–1510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x
  9. 9. Hou X., Zhang L., Zhou Z., Luo X., Wang T., Zhao X., Lu B., Chen F., Zheng L. Calcium phosphate-based biomaterials for bone repair // J. Funct. Biomater. 2022. V. 13. Р. 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13040187
  10. 10. Lyutova E.S., Tkachuk V.A., Selyunina L.A., Fedorishin D.A., Chen Y.-W. Facile synthesis of TiO2–SiO2–P2O5/CaO/ZnO with a core-shell structure for bone implantation // ACS Omega. 2022. V. 7(50). P. 46564–46572. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c05398
  11. 11. Kim T., See C.W., Li X., Zhu D. Orthopedic implants and devices for bone fractures and dеfects: past, present and perspective // Eng. Regen. 2020. V. 1. Р. 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2020.05.003
  12. 12. Ткачук В.А., Лютова Е.С., Борило Л.П., Бузаев А.А. Получение композитов TiO2–SiO2–P2O5/ZnO, исследование их свойств и возможностей применения в качестве биоматериала // Изв. вузов. Химия и хим. технология. 2024. Т. 67. № 5. С. 70–76. https://doi.org/10.6060/ivkkt.20246705.6953
  13. 13. Kaya S., Cresswell M., Boccaccini A.R. Mesoporous silica-based bioactive glasses for antibiotic-free antibacterial applications // Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018. Р. 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.11.003
  14. 14. Jeong J., Kim J.H., Shim J.H., Hwang N.S., Heo C.Y. Bioactive calcium phosphate materials and applications in bone regeneration // Biomater. Res. 2019. V. 23 (4). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0149-3
  15. 15. Wiesmann N., Tremel W., Brieger J. Zinc oxide nanoparticles for therapeutic purposes in cancer medicine // J. Mater. Chem. B. 2020. V. 8. Р. 4973‒4989. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TB00739K
  16. 16. Valiev R., Sabirov I., Zemtsova E., Parfenov E., Dluhos L., Lowe T. Nanostructured commercially pure titanium for development of miniaturized biomedical implants // Titanium in Medical and Dental Applications. Woodhead Publ., 2018. Р. 393–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812456-7.00018-4
  17. 17. Miyazaki T., Imanaka S., Akaike J. Relationship between valence of titania and apatite mineralization behavior in simulated body environment // J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2021. V. 104. Р. 3545–3553. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.17725
  18. 18. Kozik V.V., Borilo L.P., Lyutova E.S., Brichkov A.S., Chen Y.-W., Izosimova E.A. Preparation of CaO@TiO2–SiO2 biomaterial with a sol-gel method for bone implantation // ACS Omega. 2020. V. 5. P. 27221–27226. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c03335
  19. 19. Brady J., Dürig T., Lee P.I., Li J.-X. Polymer properties and characterization // Develop. Solid. Oral. Dosage. Forms. 2017. V. 7. P. 181–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802447-8.00007-8
  20. 20. Turnbull G., Clarke J., Picard F., Riches P., Jia L., Han F. 3D Bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering // Bioactive Mater. 2018. V. 3. Р. 278–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.10.001
  21. 21. Kokubo T. Bioactive glass ceramics: properties and applications // Biomaterials. 1991. V. 12. P. 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612 (91)90194-F
  22. 22. Ekimova I., Minakova T., Ogneva T. Physicochemistry of alkaline-earth metals oxides surface // AIP Conf. Proc. 2016. Р. 060014-1‒060014-5. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4937869
  23. 23. Борило Л.П., Козик В.В., Лютова Е.С., Жаркова В.В., Бричков А.С. Получение и свойства сферических биоматериалов для системы TiO2–SiO2/СаO с использованием золь–гель-метода // Стекло и керамика. 2019. Т. 76. № 7–8. С. 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10717-019-00191-6
  24. 24. Туан Т.А., Гусева Е.В., Нгуен А.Т., Ань Х.Т., Выонг Б.С., Фук Л.Х., Хиен Н.К., Хоа Б.Т., Лонг Н.В. Стандартный метод золь-гель синтеза биоактивного стекла 70S30C с использованием гидротермальной системы // Конденсированные среды и межфазные границы. 2021. Т 23. № 4. С. 585–593. https://doi.org/10.17308/kcmf.2021.23/3678
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library